New Hampshire
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
213  Elinor Purrier FR 20:25
229  Laura Rose Donegan SO 20:27
270  Anne Twombly JR 20:32
366  Chelsey Serrano JR 20:44
499  Elise Beattie SR 20:57
780  Cayla Pellegrini SR 21:18
902  Sarah Keiran FR 21:27
911  Samantha Blaise SO 21:27
1,245  Brianna Boden SO 21:49
1,246  Amanda Symanski FR 21:49
1,338  Amber Short SO 21:55
1,560  Meagan Boucher SR 22:08
1,656  Hannah Kimball FR 22:14
1,845  Brittany Hunt SO 22:25
2,000  Julia Credendino JR 22:35
2,122  Alexandria Giese FR 22:44
2,444  Cassandra Kruse FR 23:06
2,595  Mckenzie Haney SO 23:13
2,615  Megan Ross SO 23:16
3,104  Caroline Hammond SO 24:04
3,129  Madeline Allen JR 24:08
3,145  Katherine Estep FR 24:10
3,295  Haley Margareci JR 24:34
3,566  Sarah Stowell SO 25:41
National Rank #49 of 340
Northeast Region Rank #9 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 13.7%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.9%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 23.1%
Top 10 in Regional 92.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Elinor Purrier Laura Rose Donegan Anne Twombly Chelsey Serrano Elise Beattie Cayla Pellegrini Sarah Keiran Samantha Blaise Brianna Boden Amanda Symanski Amber Short
Coast-to-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/27 835 20:14 20:13 20:22 21:24 21:41 21:41
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/05 1197 21:02 21:33 21:27 21:57 22:01
NEICAAA New England Championship 10/12 891 20:23 20:26 20:45 20:57 21:01 21:24 21:22
CCSU Mini Meet 10/25 1265 21:43
America East Championships 11/02 873 20:30 20:49 20:35 20:39 20:46 21:12 21:10 21:23 22:14 21:50
Northeast Region Championships 11/15 906 20:33 20:29 20:40 20:45 21:15 21:39 21:25





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 13.7% 26.2 628 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
Region Championship 100% 7.3 229 0.2 3.0 7.5 12.3 15.1 17.5 14.7 12.6 9.8 4.2 2.0 0.7 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elinor Purrier 14.0% 126.5
Laura Rose Donegan 13.9% 131.7
Anne Twombly 13.8% 147.1
Chelsey Serrano 13.7% 180.3
Elise Beattie 13.7% 207.7
Cayla Pellegrini 13.7% 237.5
Sarah Keiran 13.7% 243.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elinor Purrier 31.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.0 3.2 3.2 3.4
Laura Rose Donegan 33.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.3 2.1 3.0 2.9 3.0
Anne Twombly 39.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.8
Chelsey Serrano 52.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3
Elise Beattie 66.4 0.0 0.0
Cayla Pellegrini 90.6
Sarah Keiran 100.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.2% 100.0% 0.2 0.2 2
3 3.0% 83.6% 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.5 2.5 3
4 7.5% 64.7% 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 2.7 4.9 4
5 12.3% 32.8% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.9 8.2 4.0 5
6 15.1% 11.5% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 13.4 1.7 6
7 17.5% 1.5% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 17.3 0.3 7
8 14.7% 0.1% 0.0 14.7 0.0 8
9 12.6% 12.6 9
10 9.8% 9.8 10
11 4.2% 4.2 11
12 2.0% 2.0 12
13 0.7% 0.7 13
14 0.2% 0.2 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 13.7% 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.2 86.3 0.2 13.5




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Stony Brook 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0